Scientists show evidence and explain how the alleged virus for Covid-19 has never been proven to exist or to cause disease

In this section you will learn that cells used in Covid-19 study experiments become diseased or die (CPE – cythopethic effect) because of the actual experiment conditions, not an alleged virus. What is presented as an alleged virus after the experiment, are typical components of diseased or dying cells (exosomes, micelles, microviilli) formed during experimental conditions.

Virologists believe that laboratory cells become diseased or die (CPE) because they are infected with the virus. In reality, these laboratory tissues and cells die because they are starved and because they are poisoned as a result of methodological tests. Virologists believe in viruses because they add allegedly infected blood, infected saliva or other supposedly infected body fluid to tissues and cells – after withdrawal of the nutrient solution and after the onset of poisoning by toxic antibiotics. They believe that death is caused by viruses. However, tissue and cells die completely on their own, without the addition of “infected” materials. Control experiments are proof.

The genetic sequence for the “Covid-19 virus: Sars-cov-2” is computer generated. The real genome doesn’t exist. What is a theoretical construct called the “Sars-cov-2” genome? It is a non-realistic creation; fiction. When inventing a genome that is not a reflection of reality, so-called “in silico” production is used. This means fabrication and production in theory: conducted or produced by means of computer modeling or computer simulation. 

There are several studies that claim to have isolated “Sars-Cov-2,” however, Freedom of Information Act Requests (FOIAs) reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of Sars-Cov-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever.


Dr. Andrew Kaufman shows evidence and explains how Exosomes are being misinterpreted as viruses

A short and simple explanation of how viruses are being misinterpreted by scientists.

The end of misinterpretation of the virus will be when control experiments are done and published. These experiments control an experiment with an alleged infection with an alleged virus. During this experiment, everything is done the same except the introduction of the alleged infectious material (eg. from a throat swab). The result of the control experiment without throat swab will have the same result as with throat swab. Which means that there is no infection and it is misinterpreted as the existence of a virus. What happens is that healthy laboratory cells die due to the experiment’s conditions – for example antibiotics, antifungal, and nutrient deprivation.

Dr. Stefan Lanka shows in his experiment that what causes disease in cells is the experiment itself (toxic antibiotics, antifungal, and nutrient deprivation), not an alleged virus.

In this video Dr Stefan Lanka, virologist, molecular and marine biologist present the findings of a recent control experiment that shows that the Cytopathic Effect (CPE) that virologists look for in their cell culture experiments is actually caused by the conditions of the cell culture rather than a “virus.” This refutes virology since no proper control experiments like this has been done since modern virology began 1954. These findings and more will be published in scientific journals once all control experiments have been completed.

Dean Braus is doing the English audio translation of Dr Stefan Lanka in this video since the video was originally made in German.



  1. Antibiotics are used to prevent the presence of bacteria because bacteria can kill healthy laboratory cells. However, a negative control experiment shows that antibiotics, not the alleged virus, kill healthy laboratory cells.
  2. Nutrient deprivation is used to make it easier for healthy laboratory cells to absorb the alleged virus. In reality, the cells die due to starvation. This is evidenced by a negative control experiment.


What is the mechanism of antibiotic toxicity? Antibiotics kill cells by damaging the membrane potential of mitochondria, damaging DNA, upregulated gene expression of glycolytic enzymes.

“The adverse effect of gentamicin on cell metabolism in three cultured mammary cell lines: “Are cell culture data skewed?”

According to the latest scientific publications, before we can talk about vaccines or an alleged human virus , we must emphasize the use of antibiotics in the isolation and identification of all human viruses, because antibiotics are used in cell cultures in the isolation of potential viruses.

For example, penicillin and streptomycin. Those are bactericidal antibiotics that are known to cause mitochondrial dysfunction and changes in cellular metabolism. It is necessary to avoid that the negative effect of antibiotics in terms of damage to healthy laboratory cells is attributed to the potential virus during the experiment of isolation of the potential virus, in order not to draw wrong conclusions.

Using antibiotics in cell culture should be avoided. Using antibiotics in cell culture has a negligible impact on gene expression.

Metabolic cell culture data will be inaccurate if experiments were performed in cell culture media containing antibiotics. There are many reports of antibiotics causing mitochondrial damage, DNA damage.

Dr. Muna Ali is a scientific support specialist at PromoCell. She recommends avoiding the use of antibiotics (*for example during covid-19 experiment)  in cell culture.

Why she recommends something like that? Because misinterpretations can be obtained, as in the case of the alleged covid-19 virus. Antibiotics that kill healthy laboratory cells are used to prove the infectivity of the alleged covid-19, the alleged virus does not need to exist at all.

– Cell cultures are cells removed from an animal or human and placed in a laboratory dish for scientific research.

– Conclusion: Virologists poison the cells with antibiotics, and then accuse the alleged virus of killing the cells!

Feel free to ask me for more info or if you don’t understand something I have illustrations to share the knowledge!

*see experiments with covid-19 (Nystadin, penicillin-streptomycin)


Damage to healthy laboratory cells due to starvation due to nutrient deprivation is misinterpreted as the presence of an alleged virus.

Healthy lab cells die from starvation and not from an alleged virus. Nutrient deprivation slows down cell metabolism, cell replication. The cells starvE.

– The 2nd factor is deprivation of nutrients.

– The 1st factor is use of toxic antibiotics (explained in previous posts)


Fetal bovine serum (FBS) contains certain nutrients necessary for the growth of healthy laboratory cells. After healthy laboratory cells are brought into contact with alleged infectious cells from the throat, virologists deprive healthy laboratory cells of nutrients in an amount of 80%. Namely, before the introduction of the alleged virus, DMEM containing 10% FBS was used, and after the introduction of the alleged virus, DMEM containing 2% FBS was used.

DMEM is a modification of Basal Medium Eagle (BME) which contains a higher concentration of amino acids and vitamins, as well as additional supplementary components. The original DMEM formula contains 1000 mg/L of glucose and was first reported for culturing embryonic mouse cells.

FBS – Fetal bovine serum (FBS) is the liquid fraction of clotted blood from fetal calves, depleted of cells, fibrin and clotting factors, but containing a large number of nutritional and macromolecular factors essential for cell growth. Bovine serum albumin is the major component of FBS. Growth factors in FBS are essential for the maintenance and growth of cultured cells. FBS also contains a variety of small molecules like amino acids, sugars, lipids, and hormones.

“Isolation, Sequence, Infectivity, and Replication Kinetics of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2”

The moment they injected the alleged infectious material from the throats of the allegedly infected persons into the healthy laboratory cells, they starved the healthy laboratory cells by depriving them of nutrients.

Also, healthy laboratory cells were previously poisoned with antibiotics. After poisoning and deprivation of nutrients, there is great damage to the laboratory’s healthy cells.

These are all retrograde scientific forces based on the 1945 experiments. This can be seen by the fact that they did not point out a negative control experiment.

If they had done a negative control experiment, they would have seen that there was no infection or virus and that they were misinterpreting the results of the experiment. Scientific work cannot be characterized as scientific if there is no negative control experiment.

Although they did not isolate the alleged covid-19, they continued to deal with damaged cells and isolate parts of the damaged cells and present those parts as parts of the virus.

With the help of the PCR test, the madness continues. This test asks whether a person is positive or negative for their own cellular components/ for animal cellular components.


*Debunking Human Virology – deprivation of nutrients 3rd part*

 Healthy laboratory cells are damaged due to nutrient deprivation and not due to the alleged virus.

One of the mechanisms that virologists use is the following. High glucose DMEM is used before the cells are inoculated with the virus. After the cells are inoculated with the virus, the cells are starved with low glucose DMEM.



I hope you are familiar with the knowledge that virologists poison healthy laboratory cells with antibiotics, and at the same time starve healthy laboratory cells, and then blame the alleged human viruses after damaging the cells by starvation and poisoning.

The latest information indicates that after the beginning of the experiment with the alleged covid-19, the toxic effect of antibiotics is intensified in the following way. Namely, the serum used before the start of the experiment is 10%, and after the start of the experiment is 2%. This serum contains the protein albumin, which blocks the action of antibiotics. Based on that, we come to the conclusion that by reducing the amount of serum by 80%, the amount of albumin is significantly reduced, antibiotics are blocked less, which enhances the toxic effects of antibiotics.

Thus, the enhanced effects of antibiotic poisoning are misinterpreted as viral replication and destruction of healthy laboratory cells by the alleged covid-19

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. The truth behind Covid-19 – VAXED

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.